They used to try to hide it. No more. Six un-elected justices allied with Trump are undermining the law and deciding how the rest of us 330 million people can live.
The court is bought and paid for by the Republican cartel. What in God's name can we do about it? Why can't the Dems do something anything legally against this president, against this fake cabinet, against this corrupt Court??
Because while the Dems might not have appointed the majority of the judges currently serving, they if given the opportunity would weigh the court in their favour. It was biden that allowed the appointment of Clarence Thomas and look how he's turned out. Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
Part of the problem is that corrupt Congress members don't want to end the gravy train, even when they're dying. They're happy to screw over their voters because they're making money to the moment they die. Besides which the corrupt Congress members are already screwing constituents even when they're young.
And an unlearned asshole like you has it absolutely backwards!
Good luck with that DEI cunt who doesn’t even know what a woman is!😂🤣🤣 And the wise-ass fat DEI latina( is there any other kind?) who couldn’t think her way out of a closet!
Post your resume so we can see your legal accomplishments. Otherwise maybe get a start on studying. Or define DEI for us…. Yes, define what you mean because it has no real meaning otherwise…. Charlie Kirk has the same words… he couldn’t even make it through the first semester of community college… maybe stay in your lane?
Hitler joined a party that initially used a socialist agenda to appeal to the working class. By the 1920s he fully introduced anti-socialism and by 1930s he was fully aligned with and spearheaded the German conservative and nationalist movements. Hitler’s Third Reich was fascist and in 1933, communists, socialists, social-democrats, immigrants, the poor, Romani, Jews, Gay, Transgender, and Lesbian people were stripped from operating in society and were kicked out of civil service. Trade Unions were outlawed. Members of the Communist and Social Democratic Parties were put in concentration camps. What a political party is named is not what defines that party. It is a party’s policies and platform that define it. Policies determine what is authoritarian or fascist or communist or any place on the spectrum of politics.
You do know that Hitler was LYING when he called it National Socialist to give the nazis the appearance of being for the working class, which they NEVER were.
You can’t be this ignorant to buy Hitler’s blatant lies 100 years later, can you?
Representative democracy clearly is over for the United States - and, more broadly, much of the West. International law has become irrelevant to the country that most often bloviates about 'rule of law' ( an essentially meaningless phrase, employed in lieu of actual, agreed upon rules and principles ). And domestically, the U.S.A. has been gradually eroding the Constitution and Bill of Rights for decades. What has changed, under the current regime, is a marked acceleration in authoritarianism. The long politicized Supreme Court - a potential hurdle for the march towards fascism - predictably has caved to the Trump administration. Many warned in the years following 9/11 that precedence were being set - by both Democrat and Republican administrations - in contravention of Constitutional principles and law. That all it would take is an autocrat to fully activate a police state. That time is now upon us.
Representative democracy in the USA was never intended to serve the interests of all Americans. The founders believed in representative democracy to serve the white male landowners who were over the age of 21 years (the age necessary for legal ownership of land at that time).
The persons who fit that profile constituted approximately 3% of the population.
Today, the ruling class of billionaires, mega-millionaires and corporations still constitutes a very small percentage (less than 3%, probably less than 0.5%) of the total population.
Your progressive (I.e. Socialist) god, FDR politicized the SCOTUS when they rightly found many of the New Deal policies unconstitutional! FDR threatened to “pack the Court” , after which the SC started to tear apart the Constitution.
So stew in your own juices, faggot!
And now you stupidly claim authoritarianism, when what you mean is you don’t like the political remedies the current administration offers as a a result of their election victory!
We got the conservatives from Republican Presidents. Obama was denied his selection by Moscow Mitch who wanted a ultra conservative court. Now we have a rapist who likes beer and two ideologues who interpret settled law to their own religious perspectives. There is an incompetent chief Justice and two unethical judges Alito and Thomas who need to be removed.
Glad you popped up into my feed @Steven Donziger thank you for explaining this - I had been listening to the Rest Is Politics and Anthony Scaramucci said the opposite and extolled Amy Comey Barrett’s opinion as being a wink and a nod re keeping authoritarianism in check and that magas wouldn’t be happy if they read the opinion.
My son and soon to be daughter in law are both lawyers and said exactly what you just said. And also said Barrett’s opinion was dangerous for lower courts - that her language was imperious. So keep saying it. And keep helping us understand these rulings.
Biden was chairman of the committee that heard Anita Hill's allegations against Thomas and then found in his favour. Expecting him to act in the interests of the people is time wasted. Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
Not accurate. You’ve been it wrong.
The extreme court has 3 justices who follow the constitution and 6 justices who don’t give a shit about the constitution.
Liberal or conservative distinctions are irrelevant.
*got
If you believe that there is no political partisanship involved in SCOTUS then you are entirely misguided & misinformed.
The court is bought and paid for by the Republican cartel. What in God's name can we do about it? Why can't the Dems do something anything legally against this president, against this fake cabinet, against this corrupt Court??
Because while the Dems might not have appointed the majority of the judges currently serving, they if given the opportunity would weigh the court in their favour. It was biden that allowed the appointment of Clarence Thomas and look how he's turned out. Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
Three congressmen died while in office and for now, we are outnumbered that is what happened.
Part of the problem is that corrupt Congress members don't want to end the gravy train, even when they're dying. They're happy to screw over their voters because they're making money to the moment they die. Besides which the corrupt Congress members are already screwing constituents even when they're young.
Not accurate. You’ve been it wrong.
The extreme court has 9 justices who don’t give a shit about the constitution.
Liberal or conservative distinctions are irrelevant.
They ALL work for their 1% masters and Wall Street.
Fixed it for both of you.
And an unlearned asshole like you has it absolutely backwards!
Good luck with that DEI cunt who doesn’t even know what a woman is!😂🤣🤣 And the wise-ass fat DEI latina( is there any other kind?) who couldn’t think her way out of a closet!
Post your resume so we can see your legal accomplishments. Otherwise maybe get a start on studying. Or define DEI for us…. Yes, define what you mean because it has no real meaning otherwise…. Charlie Kirk has the same words… he couldn’t even make it through the first semester of community college… maybe stay in your lane?
It’s obvious you don’t know shit about anything.
You must have flunked out of kindergarten.
What a learned and erudite comment. Must have graduated from an ivy league uni. Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
Sounds like your own confession, BASTARD!
It totally is an arm of the Trump Nazi Party!
You do know Nazi translates to National Socialist. You can't be this ignorant
Hitler joined a party that initially used a socialist agenda to appeal to the working class. By the 1920s he fully introduced anti-socialism and by 1930s he was fully aligned with and spearheaded the German conservative and nationalist movements. Hitler’s Third Reich was fascist and in 1933, communists, socialists, social-democrats, immigrants, the poor, Romani, Jews, Gay, Transgender, and Lesbian people were stripped from operating in society and were kicked out of civil service. Trade Unions were outlawed. Members of the Communist and Social Democratic Parties were put in concentration camps. What a political party is named is not what defines that party. It is a party’s policies and platform that define it. Policies determine what is authoritarian or fascist or communist or any place on the spectrum of politics.
You do know that Hitler was LYING when he called it National Socialist to give the nazis the appearance of being for the working class, which they NEVER were.
You can’t be this ignorant to buy Hitler’s blatant lies 100 years later, can you?
The Dancing Supremes are an arm of the Uniparty Nazi Party of the 1% BRIBERS.
Representative democracy clearly is over for the United States - and, more broadly, much of the West. International law has become irrelevant to the country that most often bloviates about 'rule of law' ( an essentially meaningless phrase, employed in lieu of actual, agreed upon rules and principles ). And domestically, the U.S.A. has been gradually eroding the Constitution and Bill of Rights for decades. What has changed, under the current regime, is a marked acceleration in authoritarianism. The long politicized Supreme Court - a potential hurdle for the march towards fascism - predictably has caved to the Trump administration. Many warned in the years following 9/11 that precedence were being set - by both Democrat and Republican administrations - in contravention of Constitutional principles and law. That all it would take is an autocrat to fully activate a police state. That time is now upon us.
Representative democracy in the USA was never intended to serve the interests of all Americans. The founders believed in representative democracy to serve the white male landowners who were over the age of 21 years (the age necessary for legal ownership of land at that time).
The persons who fit that profile constituted approximately 3% of the population.
Today, the ruling class of billionaires, mega-millionaires and corporations still constitutes a very small percentage (less than 3%, probably less than 0.5%) of the total population.
Define fascism
Your progressive (I.e. Socialist) god, FDR politicized the SCOTUS when they rightly found many of the New Deal policies unconstitutional! FDR threatened to “pack the Court” , after which the SC started to tear apart the Constitution.
So stew in your own juices, faggot!
And now you stupidly claim authoritarianism, when what you mean is you don’t like the political remedies the current administration offers as a a result of their election victory!
Bullshit, where is the truth ?
Electing judges makes them politicians.
We got the conservatives from Republican Presidents. Obama was denied his selection by Moscow Mitch who wanted a ultra conservative court. Now we have a rapist who likes beer and two ideologues who interpret settled law to their own religious perspectives. There is an incompetent chief Justice and two unethical judges Alito and Thomas who need to be removed.
Maybe criteria for judges needs to change.
What criteria??? That they have to suck your cock???🤡🤡🤡
Christian treason can’t be allowed to stand just because many of you idiotically are Christian. Ignoring it just won’t work, you need to address it.
Thank you Mr Donziger for your years of service to our country.
We need to dismantle the SC. It does not serve the people. It is corrupt.
Exactly. They should be disbanded. They are a governing body now instead of interpreters of the law. We don’t need them.
There are 330 million of us who can physically stop them
From where ? your BFFs from the CCP???😵💫😵😱😂😂😂
He's at it again. Must have graduated with honours.
Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
John Roberts was instrumental in Bush v Gore and the 2000 coup.
The Court will NOT save us.
Excellent point.
I couldn’t agree more clearly the question is how do we disrupt this and how do we prevent it from happening again?
Pretty much. I’d be very interested in what flows to SCOTUS from lenny leo and harlan crowe and their cronies. Does each conservative have an RV?
Glad you popped up into my feed @Steven Donziger thank you for explaining this - I had been listening to the Rest Is Politics and Anthony Scaramucci said the opposite and extolled Amy Comey Barrett’s opinion as being a wink and a nod re keeping authoritarianism in check and that magas wouldn’t be happy if they read the opinion.
My son and soon to be daughter in law are both lawyers and said exactly what you just said. And also said Barrett’s opinion was dangerous for lower courts - that her language was imperious. So keep saying it. And keep helping us understand these rulings.
Duh! 8647
No kidding.
These corrupted justices should’ve been held to account by Biden when he had the chance.
The DOJ, FBI and IRS should’ve investigated for ill gotten gains, not reporting income, influence peddling.
Instead Biden formed a committee…🙄
Biden was chairman of the committee that heard Anita Hill's allegations against Thomas and then found in his favour. Expecting him to act in the interests of the people is time wasted. Free free Palestine 🇯🇴🇯🇴🇯🇴
He’s also an institutionalist. He didn’t believe in the power that the corrupted Supreme Court gave to the presidency.
And here we are.